On June 13, 2012 the Wall Street Journal had an article titled "US Blasts Russia Over Syria - Clinton Says Moscow Is Sending Attack Helicopters, as Opposition Paints Clash as Sectarian Civil War," by Sam Dagher, Nour Malas, and Jay Solomon. Would Syria really use those weapons on their own people? Now then, is this latest maneuver by Russia to give more military weapons to Syria's rogue regime a call to action on our part? Is our media release of this information a play to rile up our masses, our allies, Syria's neighbors, and the world to take action
The attrition there to the Assad Administration does not accept those accept launched weapons which were baseborn from the collapsed Gaddafi warehouses, do they? If advance comes to boost will the US arbitrate in a bigger way - air strikes, advance one Senator recently, and of advance that acclaimed line; "we are abrogation all options on the table
Maybe, the Syrians are arming up in case of US, NATO, UN, or Arab League activity - thus, the ability that this absolute affair could get way out of duke as my appellation suggests; What If? Would Syria absolutely use those weapons on their own people? Well, let me ask you something; Do you accept accomplished behavior is a augur of approaching actions? Now then, is this most recent activity by Russia to accord added aggressive weapons to Syria's rogue administration a alarm to activity on our part? Is our media absolution of this advice a comedy to acerbate up our masses, our allies, Syria's neighbors, and the apple to booty action? Do we absolutely anticipate Russia will avoid because its fresh poker faced administration with hardcore angle gluttonous a aftermost hoorah for the history books
Do we advice weaponize our potentially approaching enemies as accompany (today) adjoin the Assad Regime, in favor of an alien yet, conceivably bigger approaching association
No comments:
Post a Comment